The dark side of the New Shiny

Why is all (new) software crap? Or at least, why do all the old-timers seem to think so, while all the hip young kids are all over it? Currently it’s all about MongoDB & Node, but what ever happened to LAMP or even Ruby on Rails?

A page from the history books

Back in the 90s, creating dynamic content on the web was the New Shiny; with a cheap dreamhost account that gave you shell access and an Apache configured to allow ExecCGI in your ~/public_html folder, you could simply drop a script in there and you’d be off to the races.

The New Shiny used for these dynamic pages was predominantly a language called Perl; it was installed on every Unix/Linux system and a simple “hello world” would take you mere minutes to set up.

Of course, for your first few more complicated scripts, you’d probably need some help, so you’d go to Yahoo or Altavista (yes, this is from a time before Google) and search for something like “perl cgi how to send email” to find your answers.

What you’d find as the top result was Matt’s Script Archive; a rag tag collection of various Perl scripts for common problems that you could drop straight in to your ~/public_html folder. Unfortunately, they were also poorly written, full of security holes, used absolute worst practices and taught bad code.

Even more unfortunate; they were also very popular.

So popular in fact, that the Perl community – which has it’s own repository for libraries, modules, etc called CPAN (which Pear, PyPi, NPM, and so on are modeled after) – started the NMS project to provide drop in replacements for Matts scripts that were actually of good quality, used best practices, taught sensible coding and came without all the known security holes. Eventually, even Matt himself acknowledged the problems and endorsed NMS over his own code.

But until NMS became a suitable replacement for Matts code (and gained the required ranking in search engines), people looking for how to do things in Perl found Matts archive. And they used it, they told their friends, wrote about it on Slashdot or posted about it on the Yahoo Perl Group, which in turn further increased the search ranking of Matts archive. So other beginners found it, and they posted about it, referred to it, and so on.

And all the while there was CPAN, a good source of code, full of community feedback, promotion of best practices, distributed automated testing and bug tracking; all the principles of good software development that we know and love as a community.

And still, Perl, (partially through Matt’s ScriptArchive, but of course other factors contributed) got a reputation – that persists even today – of being a hard to read, insecure language that only script kiddies used; with so many people flocking to it, using it before understanding it and the community failing to make best practices obvious and accessible, Perl buckled under the pressure of being the New Shiny.

The rise of the One-Eyed

As a result, people got frustrated with Perl, and there was room for a replacement. As PHP 4 rose the ranks, unseating Perl, to be the new darling of Dynamic Pages, the problem got worse. By now, blogs were becoming mainstream, most mailing lists had web interfaces and Google was indexing them. The One-Eyeds leading the blind became even more influential.

Then Rails came out for Ruby. Applications were becoming more complex, and there was room for a full framework (from Database to View) to unseat PHP and become the New Shiny.

By now, the hacker culture had firmly taken hold and it wasn’t just about finding the right Ruby/Rails library to do the job you wanted. Instead, as a new comer to Ruby on Rails, odds were you had to find the most current copy of a forked version of the original library on some guys website you could download. At least until that copy got forked by another guy and updated with the bug fix or feature you needed and all the while crossing your fingers none of the code you were finding was produced by a One-Eyed.

And the rise of Git & Github of course made the ‘fork and forget’ process even easier.

The Ruby community has since rallied behind Gems and has become much more vocal about best practices. But as with Perl, it is hard to unwind past habits, and some One-Eyedness remains.

Fast forward to 2012. Node is the New Shiny, and all the new comers are flocking here. And once again, the One-Eyeds are leading the blind:


In the article referenced in the tweet, written on a site called “” – making it at least sound a lot more authoritative than – there is some information that’s fundamental to understanding of how NPM works. It also sprinkles it with rants and blatantly bad advice (which breaks systems) that will be taken by the new comers as best practices or, in the worst case, Gospel, creating even more One-Eyeds.

Those who don’t learn from history…

And that’s when the industry, the jaded, those that have been through at least 4 incarnations of the New Shiny, that can see the words of the One-Eyed spoken as Gospel, respond like this:


Unfortunately, the problem of the uninformed One-Eye exists in the opposite camp as well, where people will come out with ridiculous, inflammatory, non-constructive, ill-informed statements, like in the video below, and spread that like their own Gospel in turn.


20 GOTO 10?

So how do we break this cycle? Where is the Wikipedia of Technology that actually uses facts and intelligence rather than hear-say, cargo-culting and gospel to inform and drive decisions? How do we actually teach those new to our field do build better and smarter things, rather than breeding yet another generation of One-Eyeds?


1 thought on “The dark side of the New Shiny

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s